Wednesday, January 27, 2016

The Extinction of Physical Law


The Extinction of Physical Law

In the universe, the structure of the physical laws, and the values of certain fundamental physical constants, appear to be “tuned.” That is, they appear to have values within a range that permit certain types of phenomena, including the existence of life. This could simply be happenstance. However, it is also possible that there is some process that has caused the selection of these particular physical laws and these particular fundamental constants.

If such an apparently “tuned” feature were to arise in a biological system, we would immediately hypothesize that it must be the result of the process of evolution. That is, some process of variation has caused the emergence of such a feature, and permitted its survival by the elimination of alternative features. This suggests the possibility that physical laws themselves might have evolved, and that this evolution of physical law is the cause of the observed features. This would further suggest that, in the original universe, there might have been a multiplicity of physical laws, but that only a certain few of these laws persisted. Moreover, the laws that persisted did so in such a way as to produce the observed values of fundamental constants.

Here’s one possible mechanism for the extinction of a physical law. Consider a force modeled on the Coulomb force of static electricity, namely, opposite charges attract and like charges repel. Particles that are subject to this hypothetical force would have some positive and negative property. Then, particles with like properties would repel each other while particles with opposite properties would attract each other.

Suppose further that it was possible to cancel out the positive and negative property, possibly by the particles coming into contact with each other. Suppose that all the particles in the universe possessing this property did cancel out their property, as far as was possible. There would then be two cases: either the number of particles with the positive property exactly equaled the number of particles with the negative property, or the numbers were different.

In the first case, this property of particles would cease to exist. There would be no particles to feel this hypothetical force any longer. The force would still exist, in a sense, but it would have no practical effect in the universe. Particles that formerly possessed this property would now only interact with each other, and with other matter, by other forces, such as gravitation. The hypothetical force would become extinct.

In the second case, after as much cancellation of the property was possible, a number of uncancelled particles would remain, all with the same sign. All of these particles would repel each other, and distribute themselves as far apart as possible throughout the universe.

In this way, this hypothetical force would become effectively extinct. In the first case, it would play no role at all in the universe. In the second case, it would serve only to distribute the remaining uncancelled particles at random, far from each other, throughout the universe. All the cancelled particles would then only interact with each other, and with ordinary matter, by other forces, such as gravitation.

There are indications that some such process of extinction of forces might already have occurred.

As one example, scientists have recently discovered the existence of so-called “dark matter”. Dark matter is called “dark” because it apparently doesn’t participate in any of the electromagnetic forces that produce radiation such as heat or light. We can’t see dark matter, because it’s dark in this way. We can only infer its existence because of the gravitational effects that it has on matter that we can see.

It could be that dark matter once experienced some type of force with other dark matter. In some way, that force might have become extinct, perhaps as hypothesized above. Now, all dark matter can do is interact with ordinary matter through a force that both types of matter feel: gravitation.

As another example, the theory of cosmological inflation postulates that the early universe went through an extremely rapid exponential expansion, to achieve the smoothness of distribution of matter that we now observe. However, there is no currently known force that could have caused this inflation.

It could be that there once was such a force, sufficient to cause the hypothesized cosmological inflation. But, since that inflation occurred – indeed, possibly as a result of that inflation – this force might have become extinct. It no longer operates in any meaningful way in the universe.


Thus, the extinction of physical law could be one way by which the nature of the universe changes, and features become "tuned".

Sunday, January 24, 2016

Welcome to The Goldilocks Variations

We humans live in a universe that is remarkably well-suited to our existence. In fact, it's suspiciously well-suited to us. Consider the following:
* Life depends on specific environmental conditions on Earth, especially with regard to the prevalence and properties of water.
* The Earth is just the right distance from the Sun to make life possible.
* The Earth is the right size to permit the existence of life.
* A small change in any of the fundamental physical constants would make the Universe radically different.
* If, for example, the strong nuclear force were 2% stronger than it is, this would drastically alter the physics of stars, and presumably preclude the existence of life on Earth.
* If the ratio of the strength of electromagnetism to the strength of gravity for a pair of protons were significantly smaller, only a small and short-lived universe could exist.
* If the strength of the force binding nucleons into nuclei were slightly smaller, only hydrogen could exist, and complex chemistry would be impossible. If it were slightly larger, no hydrogen would exist.
* If gravity were too strong compared with dark energy and the initial metric expansion, the universe would have collapsed before life could have evolved. On the other side, if gravity were too weak, no stars would have formed.
* If the cosmological constant was not extremely small, stars and other astronomical structures would not be able to form.
* If the ratio of the gravitational energy required to pull a large galaxy apart to the energy equivalent of its mass were too small, no stars could form. If it were too large, no stars could survive.
* If the number of spatial dimensions were 2 or 4, life could not exist.
* If the third-lowest energy state of the carbon-12 nucleus, were slightly lower or slightly larger, insufficient carbon would exist to support life.

Such conditions are called "Goldilocks" conditions. The name comes from the fairy tale of Goldilocks and the Three Bears, where Goldilocks's porridge was "just right" between the extremes of "too hot" and "too cold" and Goldilocks's bed was "just right" between the extremes of "too hard" and "too soft".  Similarly, in the universe, the conditions must be "just right" between two often-close extremes for human beings to exist.

There are various explanations for the Goldilocks conditions in the universe:
* This is all pure coincidence.
* There are multiple universes, each with different characteristics. We happen to live in the one that has all the right conditions.
* Somehow, the eventual existence of humans retroactively influences the features of the universe to make the existence of humans possible. This is called the strong anthropic principle.
* This is all backwards: life has evolved to survive under the conditions of the universe.
* It's all backwards another way: if we humans didn't exist at all, we would not observe that the conditions weren't such to make us possible.
* There is some process that causes random values to converge to the values they have.
* We are part of a complex and convincing simulation.
* The universe was designed and created by some being or beings.

Here are my observations on these possibilities:
* Pure coincidence: In other words, this isn't suspicious at all. Nothing to see here. Move along, citizen. Sorry, but it is precisely by considering such highly suspicious situations that science advances.
* Multiple universes: There is no evidence for this. I'm not sure how it's even possible to have evidence for this.
* Humans make the universe happen this way: This makes no sense to me.
* Life has evolved under the conditions of the universe: Of course, but the conditions would still have to be there.
* No humans, no issue: Well, we do exist, so ...
* The universe is a simulation: Fooled me.
* Some process causes the values to converge: I think this is possible for some of these "coincidences", but we have no idea of what this meta-process might be. Also, there are many to explain.
* Designed and created universe: This seems obvious to me: it looks designed and acts designed, so, hey, maybe it's designed.

This blog will be devoted to research and developments in this area.

The title is a pun on the Goldberg Variations by Johann Sebastian Bach, because I expect there to be a number of variations on the theme that the universe is a designed and created thing.