Thursday, February 25, 2016

The Miracle of DNA

The Miracle of DNA


As evolutionary biologists tell us, life on Earth began more than three billion years ago with single-cell organisms. It’s amazing to consider that we are the direct lineal descendants of those single-cell organisms from billions of years ago. Despite our complex minds, our technological and artistic achievements, these are our original ancestors. We ingest, as they ingested; we excrete, as they excreted; we have DNA, as they had DNA; and we are constructed of much the same chemicals. Amazing.
In fact, the situation is more amazing than this. Not only are we humans the direct descendants of these single-cell organisms, but so are all the millions of other species of life on Earth. Every koala bear, palm tree, spider, hawk, swordfish, and snapping turtle in the world has the same common ancestor.
This means, of course, that we are related to every other species on Earth. They’re all our second cousins, once removed, although it might be more accurate to describe them as our 3,000th cousins, 700 times removed. Still, our cousins. We have that common heritage, that common connection of chemistry and DNA together.
Some people take this kinship more to heart, trying to never harm any other living thing. It’s a challenging goal, since we must eat to survive, and the most easily obtained food comes from other living things. Even if one avoids this extreme, though, it makes sense to feel a connection to the other living things that share our ancestry, and to treat them with a family respect.
Yet, the situation is even more amazing than this. Consider that single-cell organism from more than three billion years ago. Its DNA eventually became our human DNA, and the DNA of every other species on earth. In other words, before there was ever a fish in the ocean, the possibility of that fish was contained in that DNA. Before there was ever a bird in the sky, the potential for that bird lay in that DNA. And before any human took a step on two feet, picked up a tool with a hand, spoke with a voice, or reasoned with a mind, that human was made possible by that single-celled organism’s DNA.
Isn’t it remarkable that such a flexible and capable molecule as DNA should have been present in that single-cell organism? After all, it didn’t need to provide for the possible arrival of more-complex descendants. Wouldn’t some far simpler mechanism for producing other single-cell organisms have been more efficient and appropriate? Why were all the astonishing capabilities of DNA necessary at that point more than three billion years ago? It’s as if the first tool devised by humans had been a Swiss Army knife rather than a stick. Somehow, DNA, for a single-cell organism, feels like overkill.
In fact, this is one of those situations that seem awfully suspicious to me. That single-cell organisms should have the ability, the potential, to produce such a vast variety of other life forms seems unnecessary and arbitrary.
I can think of a couple of explanations for the presence of such all-purpose DNA in an – at that time – simple organism.
One possibility is that the single-cell organisms on Earth didn’t originate on Earth. They originated somewhere else, the product of lots of evolution that produced such all-purpose DNA. And they got here … well, who knows how. Possibly accidentally, by some natural process, one that can convey living cells across space. Possibly deliberately. Scientists have figured out that the most efficient way to explore other planets is not to go ourselves. Send robots. Maybe include living cells that could be “injected” onto the surface of possibly habitable planets. If they don’t take, fine. If they do take, well, then maybe you get a planet whose single-cell organisms evolve into a vast variety of living things, thanks to their all-purpose DNA.
The other possibility I can think of is that DNA might be kind of inevitable. Perhaps, if you have enough randomly-created amino acids sloshing around for long enough, you inevitably get DNA, with all its latent potential for creating life. But think what this means: we live in a universe where it is almost inevitable that life like us would develop. That can hardly be random. If this is what’s happening, our universe is almost certainly designed, a created thing, with the odds skewed heavily in favor of life.



Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Pi and the Hydrogen Atom



     This is an example of something that I feel suggests that the universe is either designed, or has some underlying special structure that we are not aware of yet. Let me describe what was discovered, and what I think it means.
     Carl Hagen, a physics professor at the University of Rochester, was teaching his graduate-level physics students how to perform a particular calculation of the energy states of the hydrogen atom. This is not an unusual thing. When I was a physics grad student, I probably had to do something similar. One aside in the current situation is that Professor Hagen happens to be one of the co-discoverers of the Higgs mechanism, which has gotten so much press the last few years. This has nothing to do with that, though.
     Anyway, Hagen did the calculation himself and noticed that it was turning out oddly. He enlisted one of his students, Tamar Friedmann, to help him sort it all out. What they eventually found was that the formula they were using to calculate the energy states of the hydrogen atom also happens to be a formula for the irrational number pi.
     There are many formulas that you can use to produce the number pi. This particular one was devised by an English mathematician named John Wallis in 1655. The formula is in the form of the limit of an infinite sequence of ratios.
     In other words, what Friedmann and Hagen have found is a hitherto unknown connection between the actual physical world of atoms and the abstract world of mathematics.
     It's important to note that this connection between pi -- which has to do with circles, of course -- and the hydrogen atom has nothing to do with the fact that the simplest orbits of electrons around the atom are circles. That is completely beside the point. There are plenty of physical situations that deal with motion in circles, but whose formulas have nothing whatever to do with the number pi. This formula does, though, and that's what makes its discovery so amazing.
     Now, there seem to three different ways of looking at this discovery: "Of course", "Whatever", and "Holy crap!".
     Of course: This point of view says, Well, of course they found a connection between the physical world and the mathematical world. This happens all the time. If you pick up a rock and then pick up another rock, guess what: you've just found a physical-world example of the mathematical concept 1+1=2. This particular discovery is just a more complicated example of exactly the same thing. This is to be expected. There's nothing special to see here. Move along, citizen.
     Whatever: This point of view says, Well, okay, this is interesting, and, yeah, I guess nobody over noticed this before about the two formulas, so, sure, you can squeeze a paper out of it, I guess. But it certainly doesn't have any special meaning. It's just one of those strange things you come across now and then.
     Holy Crap!: This point of view says, Holy crap! These are two entirely unrelated areas that somehow are resulting in exactly the same thing. The laws of physics are about physics. They describe the behavior of the universe. Although they're certainly expressed using mathematics, they have nothing to do with mathematics. You would never expect to get a particular answer to a physics problem just because it was mathematically an interesting number. That a calculation of something so fundamental as the energy states of the simplest atom -- hydrogen -- would lead to the number pi is not only totally unexpected, but also, somehow, extremely significant.
     As to what the actual significance might be? I have two thoughts.
     One is that, if the universe is a designed and created thing, this is a clue from the designers of the universe. They're saying, See what we did there? In Douglas Adams's science fantasy book The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, it turns out that the Earth was designed and built for a specific purpose. At one point in the story, one of the characters travels to Norway, and observes the signature that one of the designers of the Earth hid underneath a glacier. This discovery is something like that: a suggestion that the universe was created, and that the creators left their signature in places like this.
     The other possible significance is that the universe is NOT a designed and created thing, but that there is a deep underlying structure to the universe that we are not yet aware of. This structure means that the value of the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter has something to do with the energy levels of the hydrogen atom, a connection that we don't see, to put it mildly.
     I, personally, am solidly in the Holy Crap! camp. This discovery is so unexpected, so suggestive, so inexplicable that it has to have a special meaning.
     What that meaning might be?
     Well ...
    
     Here is Friedmann and Hagen's actual paper on the subject (don't worry: it's only 4 pages long):
     Here are some links that describe Friedmann and Hagen's discovery in ordinary language: